The Human Condition: why greed is not a luxury

Wanting more has been described as ‘the human condition’: something we all suffer from, to some extent. But over recent years, it’s become a major epidemic.

Everything has to be bigger and better – a lot better. These days, we don’t just want more – we’ve come to expect a higher standard of living and and an easier life as no more than our due.

Thanks to the pressure of advertising, we want a bigger house with more luxurious furniture, a more attractive partner and healthier children, a more powerful car and rarer designer labels on our clothing. We want longer holidays in better hotels in more exotic places.

But if we get them all – what then? Nothing is ever enough. Then we want a 10-bedroom mansion with stables and a swimming-pool, a personal masseur, a private yacht…

Things have got ridiculous now.

In New York’s Serendipity Restaurant, you can buy the Grand Opulence icecream sundae for $1000. In a world where other people are starving.

The Rolls Royce Celestial, a one-off creation with a diamond-studded interior, sold for around one million dollars. For a car!

If you think that’s a little expensive for your budget, an evening dress designed by Faiyzali Abdullah was priced at – wait for it – 30 million dollars!

Because it’s all relative, of course. If everyone is rich, no one is rich. If someone isn’t driving a battered old Ford Escort, there’s no advantage in owning a gleaming Jaguar. If some poor kids in a Third World country aren’t wearing rags and being ground into the dust, there’s no point in having designer clothes. The ‘more’ that we want isn’t more than we’ve got now, but more than other people have.

Now that we in the Western world have everything we need in the way of food, warmth and shelter, shouldn’t we be satisfied with what we have instead of wasting our lives in this endless search to grab more than our share of the world’s resources?

No.

We need our greed.

Without the innate urge to accumulate more stuff than the people around us, we’d still be sitting in caves grunting and gnawing bones. Only when we grabbed the biggest bones for our own family did we start to make progress.

Our society simply cannot function without that competitive urge. Wanting success and a better life has created improvements not just in food and housing, but in technology, communications, medicine and knowledge.

Let’s hope that soon we’ll have the urge to be more compassionate than others, too.

 

Edit:

Darn it! I’ve just noticed that Seth Godin’s blog has made exactly the same point. But I made it better. And longer. And mine has a pretty picture.

Why Baby Boomers shouldn’t rant about the youth of today

It’s our own fault.

We Baby Boomers are the large generation born in the Baby Boom, from just after World War II until the early 1960s. We obeyed our parents, respected the law and treated our elders with politeness and respect, even if we thought they were unfair, boring or complete idiots.

We were brought up strictly. Our parents didn’t argue in front of us or discuss their problems with us or try to be our friends. They supervised our homework, made us practise the recorder and expected us to ask permission to leave the table after meals.

They told us to stop that noise and sit down, restricted our TV viewing time, smacked our legs if we misbehaved and cleaned dirty marks off our faces with a hankie before we went to school. Of course they hugged us when we fell over and played Monopoly with us and read us bedtime stories, but there was no question as to who was in charge.

As a backlash from that strict upbringing, many of us chose to be less formal and more lenient with our children – we wanted them to love us, not just obey us. We played boisterous games with them, teased them and cuddled them and gave them treats we hadn’t been allowed as kids.

We opened up emotionally in front of them and listened to their opinions. When they were naughty, we might have given them a slap now and then for a serious offence, but usually we reasoned with them and sometimes we even bribed them instead for the sake of peace. Life with our kids was a happy romp compared with our 1960s childhood.

We sowed the wind, and we reaped the whirlwind.

Now we’re the elders, and we want the politeness and respect we expected… but we’re finding it doesn’t work that way any more. If we want respect, we’ll have to earn it, not just demand it as our due. Our children are the free-thinkers we wanted them to be, and if they don’t think much of our opinions, they see no reason not to say so, especially now they’re adults.

The youth of today are a big disappointment to us Baby Boomers. They can’t write a simple sentence correctly, they’ve got no manners and no skills and they sit on their backsides and expect the world to pour goodies into their laps without the slightest effort on their part. They give more respect to the views of tedious footballers and talentless ‘stars’ than the opinions of their own parents.

We’ve spawned a generation of adults who think that self-improvement means getting another tattoo, living on state benefits is a career option and saying thank you on Facebook is showing enough gratitude for a £500 wedding gift. But this ranting is unfair.

The goalposts have changed, yes, but let’s remember that we were the ones who moved them.

Generations X and Y, our free-spirited children, have embraced social diversity in a way our parents never could have. They’re warm and loving and fearless.  They may be rebellious and disobedient, but they don’t automatically feel the need to kow-tow to stupid and unethical people in positions of power, either.

They make their own judgments instead of accepting ours, and if some of their decisions are wrong, they’ll find out soon enough.

We look around and see the world has changed since we were young, but that doesn’t mean we should focus only on the ways it’s changed for the worse. Yes, there have been bad changes in our lifetimes. There are also good changes – think about the progress in medicine, ecology, astronomy and telecommunications.

Sure, unemployment has increased, but at least now our kids can play Candy Crush Saga on their mobile phones while waiting at the Job Centre.

OK, that last argument didn’t come out as powerfully as I’d hoped, but you get the gist of it.

Ranting achieves nothing. We don’t need to rant about social problems like poor education, increasing unemployment, or the deification of undeserving celebrities – we need to push our governments to take positive action to fix what’s wrong for the next generation.

In middle age, we can all see what’s wrong with young people today and how the world has altered. Let’s not wait for old age to achieve wisdom.

 

Pareidolia: why it’s never safe to go upstairs

pareidolia stairsI have a bad feeling about my stairs.

But it’s not that I’m afraid of tripping on that worn-out carpet.

It’s pareidolia – the ability to detect faces (and various other significant shapes) in random arrangements of inanimate objects.

We all have this ability.

Research with young babies has shown that they’re more interested in face-like arrangements – shapes with two ‘eyes’ and a ‘mouth’ – than other random patterns.

In our evolutionary past, this ability was an advantage. Seeing something and judging in a split second that it ‘looked like a face’ could enable our ancestors to take action in time to avoid a predator.

And if it turned out not to be a predator, well, hey, it didn’t matter. There was no evolutionary disadvantage, apart from a few sniggering stegosauruses thinking you’re a complete wally.

Continue reading “Pareidolia: why it’s never safe to go upstairs”

Second-class thinking

eggI have to face it: I have a second-class brain.

Of course, we can’t all be geniuses, but I want to be super-intelligent so badly I can taste it. I want to know everything. Well, everything except boring stuff like who are the Kardashians and who played Pugsley in the Addams Family. Real stuff.

But no matter how hard I try, I just can’t get my head around science.

Continue reading “Second-class thinking”

GIGO: it must be true; it’s on the computer

canstockphoto13030999The age of the reference book is dead. And it’s hardly surprising.

When we need to know something, there’s one place we always look first: Google. It can filter results from millions of websites and suggest answers in less than a second. Amazing!

No more desperate struggling with index references in book after book to try to find the information we need. Computerised data is easier to search and constantly updated. And with predictive text, we don’t even need to learn to spell the words correctly, as the computer can guess what we meant to write.

But let’s not forget an important piece of computer terminology: GIGO. Garbage In, Garbage Out. If the information that’s been put into the computer is rubbish, it cannot come up with the right answers. Continue reading “GIGO: it must be true; it’s on the computer”